01487nam a2200229Ia 4500003000400000005001700004008004100021040001000062082000800072082000800080100001700088245002600105250001500131260002100146260000900167300001000176365000600186365000600192365000600198505103600204650001701240OSt20230728093713.0181031s9999    xx            000 0 und d  ckrvia  a711  bKev1 aKevin, Lynch10aThe Image of the City  aPhotocopy.  bThe M.I.T. Press  c1982  a194p.  b0  d0  e0  aI. The Image of the Environment p.1, Legibility, p.2, Building the Image,p. 6, Structure and Identity, p.8, Imageability,p. 9, II. Three Cities p.14, Boston, p.16, Jersey City, p.25, Los Angeles, p.32, Common Themes, p.43, III. The City Image and Its Elements p.46, Paths, p.49, Edges, p.62, Districts, p.66, Nodes, p.72, Landmarks, p.78, Element Interrelations, p.83, The Shifting Image, p.85, Image Quality, p.87, IV. City Form p.91, Designing the Paths, p.95, Design of Other Elements, p.99, Form Qualities, p.105, The Sense of the Whole, p.108, Metropolitan Form, p.112, The Process of Design, p.115, V. A Ne w Scale p.118, Appendices: A. Some References to Orientation p.123, Types of Reference Systems, p.128, Formation of the Image, p.131, The Role of Form, p.133, Disadvantages of Imageability, p.138, B. The Use of the Method p.140, The Method as the Basis for Design, p.155, Directions for Future Research, p.156. C. Two Examples of Analysis p.160, Beacon Hill, p.160, Scollay Square, 173. Bibliography p.182, Index p.187  aUrban Design