000			01515nam a22002057a 4500
003			OSt
005			20230805102324.0
008			190916b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780262620017
040			_ckrvia
082			_a711 _bLYN
100	1		_aLynch, Kevin _9317
245	1	0	_aThe Image of the City
260			_aLondon _bMIT Press _c1960
300			_a194p.
365			_aRs. _bRs.1968 _cRs. _d30 _eRs.1378
505			_aI. The Image of the Environment p.1, Legibility, p.2, Building the Image,p. 6, Structure and Identity, p.8, Imageability,p. 9, II. Three Cities p.14, Boston, p.16, Jersey City, p.25, Los Angeles, p.32, Common Themes, p.43, III. The City Image and Its Elements p.46, Paths, p.49, Edges, p.62, Districts, p.66, Nodes, p.72, Landmarks, p.78, Element Interrelations, p.83, The Shifting Image, p.85, Image Quality, p.87, IV. City Form p.91, Designing the Paths, p.95, Design of Other Elements, p.99, Form Qualities, p.105, The Sense of the Whole, p.108, Metropolitan Form, p.112, The Process of Design, p.115, V. A Ne w Scale p.118, Appendices: A. Some References to Orientation p.123, Types of Reference Systems, p.128, Formation of the Image, p.131, The Role of Form, p.133, Disadvantages of Imageability, p.138, B. The Use of the Method p.140, The Method as the Basis for Design, p.155, Directions for Future Research, p.156. C. Two Examples of Analysis p.160, Beacon Hill, p.160, Scollay Square, 173. Bibliography p.182, Index p.187
650	1	0	_aUrban Design _9318
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c7763 _d7763